Talk:Vehicle Weapon Appendix: Difference between revisions
Reginald2710 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Wired 4fun (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Yup, I was planning on that. One thing: How should comparisons be done? If an MG has good damage for an MG, but does a lot less damage than a Nuke, how many stars should it get? It could be misleading to give them both 5 stars. I was thinking do it relative to its own category only, and leave the damage figures next to it for absolute comparisons. -- [[User:Broccoli|Broccoli]] 07:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT) | Yup, I was planning on that. One thing: How should comparisons be done? If an MG has good damage for an MG, but does a lot less damage than a Nuke, how many stars should it get? It could be misleading to give them both 5 stars. I was thinking do it relative to its own category only, and leave the damage figures next to it for absolute comparisons. -- [[User:Broccoli|Broccoli]] 07:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
:It's only logical that weapons are compared within their own category. Wouldn't make much sense otherwise. --[[User:L3TUC3|L3TUC3]] 14:01, 10 September 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:01, 11 September 2007
The clip size for each weapon needs to be added.
Give Engines and Armor their own seperate pages?
I think this page would be better off if it were split into at least 3 seperate pages, with engines, armor, and weapons. --Arklansman 20:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
I concur. Also, how about some kind of visual indication of each weapon's strengths. For example a bar chart or a star rating system. Broccoli 17:31, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
I thought the same when I made this page, but the armour and engines were so tiny in comparison even if you'd bulge it up with tips, I just left it. Oh, and could a mod delete the .jpg versions of the icons? --Beerdude26 22:05, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
I like the star system. Added here, too, perhaps?--The Buttery Lobster 23:28, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Yup, I was planning on that. One thing: How should comparisons be done? If an MG has good damage for an MG, but does a lot less damage than a Nuke, how many stars should it get? It could be misleading to give them both 5 stars. I was thinking do it relative to its own category only, and leave the damage figures next to it for absolute comparisons. -- Broccoli 07:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT)
- It's only logical that weapons are compared within their own category. Wouldn't make much sense otherwise. --L3TUC3 14:01, 10 September 2007 (EDT)