Talk:Map:emp isle: Difference between revisions
Wired 4fun (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Reginald2710 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
We need to redo the Rocket Sniping section to account for RPG power Vs. Buildings changes in the latest RCs. --[[User:Chahk|Chahk]] 16:38, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | We need to redo the Rocket Sniping section to account for RPG power Vs. Buildings changes in the latest RCs. --[[User:Chahk|Chahk]] 16:38, 13 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
: I think we can safely take it out. RPG's don't do that much damage anymore vs buildings. --[[User:L3TUC3|L3TUC3]] 02:06, 14 September 2007 (EDT) | : I think we can safely take it out. RPG's don't do that much damage anymore vs buildings. --[[User:L3TUC3|L3TUC3]] 02:06, 14 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
These commander strategies are a little long-winded. Is it possible to leave some aspects to intuition, or at least split them into several points? Ideally these should only serve as inspiration, not step-by-step "how to win" guides. -- [[User:Broccoli|Broccoli]] 07:33, 16 September 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:33, 16 September 2007
The commander can't use rockets. :P --Arklansman 23:46, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
We need to redo the Rocket Sniping section to account for RPG power Vs. Buildings changes in the latest RCs. --Chahk 16:38, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
- I think we can safely take it out. RPG's don't do that much damage anymore vs buildings. --L3TUC3 02:06, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
These commander strategies are a little long-winded. Is it possible to leave some aspects to intuition, or at least split them into several points? Ideally these should only serve as inspiration, not step-by-step "how to win" guides. -- Broccoli 07:33, 16 September 2007 (EDT)