Talk:Vehicle Weapon Appendix: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Vehicle Payload Appendix moved to Talk:Vehicle Weapon Appendix: cuz it be weapons only now) |
BlackRedDead (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I thought the same when I made this page, but the armour and engines were so tiny in comparison even if you'd bulge it up with tips, I just left it. Oh, and could a mod delete the .jpg versions of the icons? --[[User:Beerdude26|Beerdude26]] 22:05, 23 June 2007 (EDT) | I thought the same when I made this page, but the armour and engines were so tiny in comparison even if you'd bulge it up with tips, I just left it. Oh, and could a mod delete the .jpg versions of the icons? --[[User:Beerdude26|Beerdude26]] 22:05, 23 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
I like the star system. Added here, too, perhaps?--[[User:The Buttery Lobster|The Buttery Lobster]] 23:28, 7 September 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 11:28, 8 September 2007
The clip size for each weapon needs to be added.
Give Engines and Armor their own seperate pages?
I think this page would be better off if it were split into at least 3 seperate pages, with engines, armor, and weapons. --Arklansman 20:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
I concur. Also, how about some kind of visual indication of each weapon's strengths. For example a bar chart or a star rating system. Broccoli 17:31, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
I thought the same when I made this page, but the armour and engines were so tiny in comparison even if you'd bulge it up with tips, I just left it. Oh, and could a mod delete the .jpg versions of the icons? --Beerdude26 22:05, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
I like the star system. Added here, too, perhaps?--The Buttery Lobster 23:28, 7 September 2007 (EDT)